National laws are not allowed to flout EU law on
The law of the European Union is above national law. This principle, the European Court of Justice (ECJ), the highest court in the EU, 18 July 2007 in Luxembourg with a ruling in a dispute over aid to enterprises in Italy confirmed.
National courts must not ignore, according to the judge's decision on EU law and may need to make local laws and regulations in mind (AZ: C-119/05). background is a 1985 proposed by an Italian company aid that the national authority - before the relevant decision of the European Commission - granted. In 1990, UNESCO, the Brussels authorities, the aid to be inadmissible. The company sued the Italian authorities to keep the subsidies. Court admitted the company to aid in the judgments from 1991 to 1994. The process ended up before an Italian court that asked the ECJ to clarify responsibilities and powers.
The Court emphasized that while national courts had the right to have examined the validity of acts of the EU.
you are not empowered to determine their own obsolescence.
The company would then consider the decision of the Commission not only by a national court may allow.
Understanding
EC law lays the Member States a duty to inspect and the burden of proof on . (ECJ, Rs.C-42/02, Lindman, ECR 2003, I-13519, paras 25 and 26;. ECJ, Case C-67/98, Zenatti, Opinion of GA Fennelly, ECR 1999, I- 7301, para 29.)
compatibility of the legal basis of EU law
primacy of the immediately applicable EU law
If the review of a provision of a Parliament Act in question, have the competing critical court (and therefore the exam agent) in addition to the compatibility of the provision with higher-ranking national (constitutional) law and its compatibility with EU law to investigate.
This follows from the principle of the primacy of EU law over national law
1 collides with a national rule directly applicable EU law, it loses its applicability. If it is not then in the applicable national standard to provide a legal basis for issuing an administrative act accordingly, thus the lack of a the Principle of reservation of the law does justice to the legal basis. The administrative reason alone illegal.
VerwProzR_Rn_659-690
On
first December 2010 decided unanimously
"The decision of the State Labor Court of Cologne of 23 January 2007 - 13 Sa 954/06 - violates the complainant's fundamental right under Article 2, paragraph 1 in conjunction with Article 20, paragraph 3 of the Basic Law " " With its timely submitted constitutional complaint. The complainant alleges, inter alia, the violation of Article 2 paragraph 1 GG in conjunction with the rule of law (Article 20, paragraph 3 GG). "paragraph 14 " This was not part of cost barriers from pursuing legitimate interests and protected positions held by legal or cause to be hopeless and that they are implemented at the same time, costly legal proceedings to have. "
para 15
1, before the Treaty of Lisbon
this power was referring to Community law.
The Treaty of Lisbon and the progress of European integration
judge at the European Court of Justice, Luxembourg / Cologne extract The Treaty of Lisbon extend the jurisdiction of the Court on all the activities of the Union.
The Treaty of Lisbon will once again before a considerable enlargement of the powers of the European Union, the European regulatory authority is no longer a central policy area remains closed. This extension of the political scope of the European Union is - as it were, in return - a significant emphasis on the legal limits of the powers of the European Union hand in hand. The Treaty of Lisbon, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union through a reference in Article 6 § 1 EU is equipped with primary legal binding force.
inaugural lecture Prof. Günter Verheugen, European University Viadrina Frankfurt / O
contract Amsterdam establishing the EC
The Commission has for years urged to
letter compliance with Community law.
letter dated 04/04/2006
, IP/06/436 v. 4 April 2006 and
of 31 January 2008
IP/08/119
; ECJ template - VG Schleswig-Holstein, Decision of 30.01.2008, Az: 12 O 102/06 infringement procedures - free movement of services:
Overview
, Opinions of Attorneys General from Jan. 2010 in this blog.
EDZ - ArchiDok full-text database with direct access to the archived EU online publications more on European law and: answered, as the jurisprudential doctrine of the crucial questions about the judgments of the ECJ of 8 September 2010? press release on the ruling of the ECJ - AZ: C-338/04, C-359/04, C-360/04 Plancania . EFTA Court, Judgement of 30.05.2007 - Rs 3 / 06 Ladbrokes explanations on the draft of the new State Treaty on gaming by 14/12/2006
draft of the new State Treaty on gaming in Germany from
binding effect of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights for national courts, the relations between the Constitution and international law
Source: original document on the website of the Federal Constitutional Court:
s . also the press release by the Federal Constitutional Court No 92/2004 of 19.10.2004
Amtl. Summary:
first To bind to the law and the law (Article 20, paragraph 3 GG) address the guarantees of the Convention is to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms and decisions by the European Court of Human Rights in methodologically justifiable interpretation of the law. Both the failure to consider a decision of the Court and that contrary to prior right schematic "enforcement" may offend against fundamental rights in conjunction with the rule of law. second In the light of decisions of the Court, the state organs, the impact on the national legal system in their application of the law have included. This is especially true when it is in the relevant national law is a balanced partial system of domestic law, the differing fundamental rights will bring together for balance.
0 comments:
Post a Comment